tinygrad: For something between [PyTorch](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch) and [karpathy/micrograd](https://github.com/karpathy/micrograd). Maintained by [tiny corp](https://tinygrad.org).
Due to its extreme simplicity, it aims to be the easiest framework to add new accelerators to, with support for both inference and training. If XLA is CISC, tinygrad is RISC.
tinygrad is still alpha software, but we [raised some money](https://geohot.github.io/blog/jekyll/update/2023/05/24/the-tiny-corp-raised-5M.html) to make it good. Someday, we will tape out chips.
- No code golf! While low line count is a guiding light of this project, anything that remotely looks like code golf will be closed. The true goal is reducing complexity and increasing readability, and deleting `\n`s does nothing to help with that.
- All docs and whitespace changes will be closed unless you are a well-known contributor. The people writing the docs should be those who know the codebase the absolute best. People who have not demonstrated that shouldn't be messing with docs. Whitespace changes are both useless *and* carry a risk of introducing bugs.
- Anything you claim is a "speedup" must be benchmarked. In general, the goal is simplicity, so even if your PR makes things marginally faster, you have to consider the tradeoff with maintainablity and readablity.
- In general, the code outside the core `tinygrad/` folder is not well tested, so unless the current code there is broken, you shouldn't be changing it.
- If your PR looks "complex", is a big diff, or adds lots of lines, it won't be reviewed or merged. Consider breaking it up into smaller PRs that are individually clear wins. A common pattern I see is prerequisite refactors before adding new functionality. If you can (cleanly) refactor to the point that the feature is a 3 line change, this is great, and something easy for us to review.
- Bug fixes (with a regression test) are great! This library isn't 1.0 yet, so if you stumble upon a bug, fix it, write a test, and submit a PR, this is valuable work.
- Solving bounties! tinygrad [offers cash bounties](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1WKHbT-7KOgjEawq5h5Ic1qUWzpfAzuD_J06N1JwOCGs/edit?usp=sharing) for certain improvements to the library. All new code should be high quality and well tested.
- Features. However, if you are adding a feature, consider the line tradeoff. If it's 3 lines, there's less of a bar of usefulness it has to meet over something that's 30 or 300 lines. All features must have regression tests. In general with no other constraints, your feature's API should match torch or numpy.
- Refactors that are clear wins. In general, if your refactor isn't a clear win it will be closed. But some refactors are amazing! Think about readability in a deep core sense. A whitespace change or moving a few functions around is useless, but if you realize that two 100 line functions can actually use the same 110 line function with arguments while also improving readability, this is a big win. Refactors should pass [process replay](#process-replay-tests).
- Tests/fuzzers. If you can add tests that are non brittle, they are welcome. We have some fuzzers in here too, and there's a plethora of bugs that can be found with them and by improving them. Finding bugs, even writing broken tests (that should pass) with `@unittest.expectedFailure` is great. This is how we make progress.
- Dead code removal from core `tinygrad/` folder. We don't care about the code in extra, but removing dead code from the core library is great. Less for new people to read and be confused by.
[Process replay](https://github.com/tinygrad/tinygrad/blob/master/test/external/process_replay/process_replay.py) compares your PR's generated kernels against master. If your PR is a refactor or speedup without any expected behavior change, It should include [pr] in the pull request title, [example](https://github.com/tinygrad/tinygrad/pull/4995). Note that you should keep your branch up-to-date with master.